Stop perplexing to make digital print frames happen. It’s over and here’s why

December 11, 2015 - photo frame

Once on a time, people gave digital print frames, such as this Digital Foci 8-inch one that was accessible in 2008, as holiday gifts. Credit: Digital Foci.

Once on a time, people gave digital print frames, such as this Digital Foci 8-inch one that was accessible in 2008, as holiday gifts. Credit: Digital Foci.

The panic has amped adult usually a small bit as Christmas gets closer and I’m far, distant divided from completing my shopping. So we do crop a online sale emails and click like a drowning swimmer reaching for a life preserver on those email promos that guarantee mind-blowing sales though don’t tell we accurately what’s on sale.

It was an Amazon email that got me to click for “12 Days of Deals.” And that’s when we saw it. A understanding for an $85 digital print frame.

I blinked. we squinted. we practiced a settings on my mechanism monitor. Was we saying that right? Digital design frames, that seemed like they competence be a destiny of displaying photos in a home behind in, oh, contend 2009, are still a thing?

I checked into a matter. It turns out my initial instinct was right. They are no longer a thing, as reliable by a Consumers Digest essay from final year (“Digital Photo Frames: Fading from View”) that succinctly nailed a coffin on a record that now sounds some-more like a punchline than a good present idea.

What happened? Why did this once-promising record spin into a bargain-bin relic?

I have some thoughts:

  • Digital print frames were forward of their time. People were regulating digital cameras and gnawing photos with their phones behind in 2008-2010, though they were typically low-res photos that didn’t demeanour good blown adult into design frames and were not easy to transfer. Remember, this was before Facebook was a renouned place to store photos, before wirelessly syncing photos opposite all your inclination was possible, and before amicable networks like Instagram incited everybody into artsy digital photographers.
  • Digital print frames were a con to set up. The era of digital print frames that were accessible during a rise of their recognition mostly looked poetic on a outside, though had terrible program that was not easy to set up. we contend that as someone who gave digital print frames as gift, afterwards watched kin onslaught to get photos installed into a thing, or to get them to arrangement properly. Based on this Wall Street Journal story from progressing this year, they’re still distant from ideal to operate.
  • There were no print frames from Apple, Instagram or Google. Design and coherence matter in consumer tech. With menus designed by companies such as Kodak and Viewsonic instead of, say, Apple, it’s no consternation that print frames were tough to operate. And there’s never been any kind of customary handling complement opposite print frames, so selling a new print support opposite from ones we already owned would meant training a whole new set-up for handling them. They frequency seemed value a training curve.
  • The Instacube fiasco. One of a best Kickstarter ideas I’ve ever seen was Instacube, a dead-simple brick support that would arrangement your Instagram feed. The problem is that a Kickstarter, that happened in 2012, still hasn’t generated a products betrothed for a backers. It has become a Kickstarter cautionary tale. And what could have popularized a new era of slick, easy-to-use digital print frames, has instead turn an attention joke. The association behind is is now offered a $150 product called #Cube. Given a lane record, it’s tough to suggest that.
  • A bolt of products busted a market. The digital print support disturb happened so quick and prices forsaken so quick around 2009-2010 that what could have turn a mainstream product instead became dominated by unknown brands (Kodak and Polaroid were exceptions) putting out inexpensive products during cut-rate prices. Digital print frames didn’t get many better and some-more sophisticated. And their days were numbered when other products emerged that would offer a same purpose.
  • Tablets and TV streaming ate their lunch. It’s substantially no fluke that digital print frames started to feel like junk around 2010. That’s a same year that Apple introduced a iPad, that would flog off a series in inscription computers. Tablets could simply arrangement photos, were many some-more unstable than digital print frames (which typically compulsory being plugged in or customary batteries), and had Internet capabilities for pity and downloading that print frames could usually dream about. Since then, inclination like Apple TV and Chromecast have also done it easier to arrangement photos on a big, HD screen. Why settle for a 5 x 7 print support when we can uncover family snapshots on a 55-inch TV?

Ultimately, digital print frames suffered from that many lethal of tech problems: bad timing. They’re still around, though if you’re severely deliberation giving one as a present (yes, I’ve been that unfortunate too), we should give it some critical thought. And maybe keep shopping.

small.wp_rp_excerpt { line-height:115%; font-style:normal; } .related_post_title { } ul.related_post { line-height:120%; } ul.related_post li { list-style-type:none; clear:both; margin:0 0 0 3px; } ul.related_post li a { font-weight: bold; display:block; margin:0 0 5px 0; } ul.related_post li a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } ul.related_post li A img { width:130px; height:auto; }

More frame ...

› tags: photo frame /