Muslim ‘Foreign Policy Analyst’ Tries to Frame Carson, Trump, and Cruz for …

September 30, 2015 - photo frame

On CNN Monday, “foreign process analyst” Rula Jebreal pronounced that Ben Carson, Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) would have “blood on their hands” if someone shot people during a mosque.

“Foreign process analyst” – this is a media-speak substitution for Muslim bullies and Islamic supremacist thugs who meant to levy a sharia (do not impugn Islam) by wrecking ball.

In Muslim countries, if we contend anything that violates sharia heresy law, we are assassinated. In a West, a using dogs in a media murder your good name, your good character.

This pre-emptive assign that these 3 possibilities will have blood on their hands is a ideal box in point. This is evil. Jebreal is job dauntless law tellers murderers for revelation a truth. But this is a sharia — make no mistake. Under Islamic law (sharia) we can't impugn or insult Islam underneath chastisement of death, even if what we contend is true.

It was given of those laws that righteous Muslims gathering 1,000 miles from Phoenix to Garland, Texas, final May, formulation to murder hundreds of Americans during a giveaway debate conference. It is given of these laws that bloggers in Bangladesh are slaughtered in a many hideous fashion. It was given of sharia heresy laws that a Muhammad cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo were slaughtered final Jan in Paris. It was given of these laws that Muslims worldwide rioted and killed over a Danish Muhammad cartoons. It was given of these laws that Salman Rushdie lived in stealing for decades.

Rula Jebreal has no problem with any of that. Jebreal is a savage, shrugging off a genocide of Christians and eremite minorities in a means of Islam, and sniffing during a infamous Jew-hatred that is extolled in a Quran. The Muslim universe is abandoned of Jews, and a guns of a Muslim neighbors have been consistently forked during a little Jewish state given a reestablishment in 1948.

Jebreal sees no emanate with any of this. Tens of thousands of Muslim groups are intent in jihadi wars, land appropriations, informative annihilations and enslavements, citing Quran section and verse. Jebreal’s overpower on all this is sanction.

Americans are being targeted by these same killers, and Jebreal attacks those who brave to pronounce about it. When Carson’s business manager Armstrong Williams pronounced that a media and other Muslims should malign a actions of Islamic terrorists, Jebreal responded: “I don’t know where he’s living. we don’t know what radio he’s watching, though he is in sum denial. Not usually that, he’s articulate about crimes committed in Iran and Saudi Arabia.”

No, they are function all over a universe — and in America. Has Jebreal never listened of a Fort Hood jihad massacre? The Boston Marathon jihad bombing? The scores of Americans who have already left to join ISIS, and a 58 Muslims who have already been charged with helping ISIS this year alone? The countless foiled jihad plots on U.S. soil that are unclosed all a time?

“What [do] Muslims in America have to do with that?” Jebreal asks. “Why [do] they need to be criminalized given of that?”

How are they being criminalized?

There is a unequivocally genuine need for Muslims in a U.S. not only to malign ISIS, though to learn immature Muslims since this bargain of Islam is wrong and contingency be rejected.

If a Islamic State is not Islamic, what is it? How did this disagreement of Islam turn so widespread? Why are so many American Muslims fasten a Islamic State?

And while Muslims in a U.S. reject a Islamic State, where are they training opposite a beliefs that gave arise to it?

Right now, zero is being finished to stop jihad recruiting in U.S. mosques, even as several hundred immature Muslims from a U.S. have left to salary jihad for a Islamic State.

If a moderates unequivocally reject extremism, let them uncover it by instituting genuine programs to learn opposite jihad and Islamic supremacism.

Jebreal asked: “Would we ever accept a presidential claimant that would request a same rules, would contend a same thing about Jews and black[s]? We would never endure them, would never honour them, would never even accept them, we [would] evade them aside. But we accept it opposite Muslims, because, sadly, in a Republican base, this is what is appealing to them today.”

Jews are not murdering in a name of Hashem. Christians are not murdering in a name of Christ. There is a unequivocally genuine difference: domestic Islam is seditious. It contradicts a Constitution in countless ways, many particularly by denying a leisure of debate and a equivalence of rights before a law of women and non-Muslims.

Jebreal, never acknowledging any of that, continued, “What happened with Trump, a — we are deliberating a initial partial of what was said, and Trump endorsed, that is we have a problem called Muslims. But there’s a second part, how to get absolved of them. And in a area of possibility, in a nation that is unequivocally armed, that somebody, that will be carrying [a] arms will go to a mosque tomorrow, or after tomorrow, and will start sharpened people, and afterwards these people will have blood on their hands, all of them. Carson, Trump, and Ted Cruz.”

Jebreal has taken a parable of Islamophobia and calculated hatred to a subsequent level: murder charges…. on CNN. This is who CNN has on. They don’t ask me on, or Ibn Warraq or Robert Spencer or Wafa Sultan. Only one indicate of perspective is allowed: an inflammatory and rebellious one.

Pamela Geller is a President of a American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop a Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to a Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

small.wp_rp_excerpt { line-height:115%; font-style:normal; } .related_post_title { } ul.related_post { line-height:120%; } ul.related_post li { list-style-type:none; clear:both; margin:0 0 0 3px; } ul.related_post li a { font-weight: bold; display:block; margin:0 0 5px 0; } ul.related_post li a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } ul.related_post li A img { width:130px; height:auto; }

More frame ...

› tags: photo frame /