In and Out of Frame: Lorraine O’Grady’s “Art Is…”

September 5, 2015 - photo frame

Lorraine O’Grady, “Art Is. . . (Cop Framed)” (1983/2009), chromogenic tone print, 16 x 20 inches (all images pleasantness Alexander Gray Associates, New York and © 2015 Lorraine O’Grady/Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York)

Like a Choose Your Own Adventure story or a diversion of Mad Libs, a elliptical pretension of Lorraine O’Grady’s 1983 opening piece, “Art Is…,” creates space, witty and inviting, for structured assembly participation. You fill in a blank, a pretension says, in a demotic spirit, Art can be whatever we wish it to be. But ellipses do not simply, or even primarily, imply open space, a “to be continued” available information; they also imply omission, something left out, maybe suppressed. Both functions of a ellipsis — invitation and termination — are during play via a piece, and we don’t meant “at play” metaphorically. O’Grady and her assembly had a darned good time creation art about something — African-American subjectivity — that is mostly blank from art. Their joy, thirty years on, is still infectious.

For a performance, O’Grady entered a boyant into that year’s African-American Day Parade, that ran, and still runs, adult Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard in Harlem. On a side of a float, in large letters, were a disproportion “ART IS…”; atop it, using lengthwise, was a large 9’x15’ bullion pattern frame. In impression as “Mlle Bourgeoise Noire,” a persona she had adopted, in a years prior, as a guise enabling her to pile-up art star events and pull courtesy to issues of secular underrepresentation, O’Grady and a unit of 15 African-American and Latino performers, dressed all in white, walked around a boyant carrying dull bullion pattern frames. The dull frames were infrequently handed to onlookers, infrequently hold in front of them, Vanna White-style, to inspire a mostly black assembly to cruise themselves as current subjects, even makers, of art. Photographs taken by several people who witnessed these framings were afterwards collected by O’Grady to request a performance. Forty of those images are now on perspective in an eponymous vaunt of “Art Is…” during a Studio Museum in Harlem. The formula are intelligent and exuberant, a pleasant Conceptualist delight of both conduct and heart.

Lorraine O’Grady, “Art Is. . . (Girlfriends Times Two)” (1983/2009), chromogenic tone print, 16 × 20 inches

Take, for example, “Art Is… (Girlfriends Times Two).” Standing before a unenlightened throng of parade-goers are dual apart pairs of girls, maybe 8 or 10 years of age, any span holding an dull frame, with their faces scrunched together corresponding inside it. Three of a girls grin with full-mouthed mirth while a fourth plants a witty lick on a impertinence of her frame-mate. The pattern is plain fun to admire, heart-warming, even, as lovable and nonsensical cinema of children mostly are. At a same time, a many compositional doublings — dual inner frames, dual groupings of dual girls, dual graphic halves to a pattern — bespeak a image’s grave complexity and unpractical rigor. The image’s doublings amplify a self-reflexivity that runs via all of “Art Is…”: not usually does a pretension vigilance that this is art about art, though any pattern in a uncover contains an tangible pattern frame, mostly churned pattern frames, within a incomparable “frame” of a photograph. Sometimes, even, there is a support within a support within a frame, or a support overlapping a support within a frame. Framing, in a piece, so becomes method, content, and metaphor.

Idiomatically, to be framed means to have been unwittingly set adult so that others understand we as a perpetrator of a crime we didn’t commit. O’Grady means zero scarcely so guileful with her framings — utterly a discordant — though this use points adult a approach in that framing, of whatever kind, always works by a routine of resourceful inclusion and exclusion. If you’ve been framed for a crime, it means that others have been cheated about your actions; a law about that crime lies outward a support someone else has imposed on you. Within an African-American context, selecting your support or being subjected to it constitutes many some-more than an idle embellishment about art-making.

Questions about inclusion and ostracism are everywhere in “Art Is…,” interjection to a pleasing and supernatural void of a many frames contained therein. Ordinarily, frames symbol a disjunct between inside and outside, a line of disproportion between pattern and museum wall, family mural and mantelpiece. But since a frames of “Art Is…” enclose no tangible pictures, what we can see inside of them is always coextensive with what we can see outward of them, and so a borders between inside and outward come to seem arbitrary. This donut hole outcome not usually divides adult a manifest space of a photographs in surprising and constrained ways, giving them an off-balance, Winograndian whimsy, though it also means that there’s mostly as many going on outward a photograph’s inner support as in it.

Lorraine O’Grady, “Art Is… (Woman with Man and Cop Watching)” (1983/2009), chromogenic tone print, 16 × 20 inches

“Art Is… (Woman with Man and Cop Watching)” is deputy in this regard. The core of a sketch consists of a performer holding adult a tiny support around herself and another woman; both their smiles are subdued, neutral. Outside that frame, behind and around a dual women, is a duds of expressive, in some cases troubling, men’s faces. From left to right: a black masculine with a sarcastic eyebrow; a black masculine snarling in a instruction of a pattern frame; a black masculine in sunglasses, preoccupied to a scene, staring off into a distance; a white cop, arms crossed, detachedly watching a women, his countenance something between a cackle and a sneer. This throng of churned expressions, and not a face of a suggested framed woman, is where many of a photo’s movement indeed takes place.

Lorraine O’Grady, “Art Is. . . (Girl Pointing)” (1983/2009), chromogenic tone print, 20 × 16 inches (click to enlarge)

The centrality of side movement is pivotal to O’Grady’s routine (which turns a spectators, rather than a march itself, into a performance’s focus). This concentration is also an substantial critique of a marginalization of African-Americans’ experiences. Two of a some-more supernatural photographs in a array illustrate this element by trait of what is blank from them. “Art Is… (Cross Street)” is a sole sketch in that a swath of dull space, rather than a chairman or a building, gets framed: usually a deep, V-shaped throng of sky, cut from a buildings on possibly side of a street, with a quarrel of apart tellurian heads peeking adult over a bottom of a float’s frame. The deficiency of a richly minute amiability prisoner elsewhere creates we comprehend usually how colourful and visually full a other images are.

Likewise “Art Is… (Cop Framed),” in that a lady performer presses adult tighten opposite a white masculine cop, his hands knitted and forcing a smile, to support his face. While many of a other photographs featuring people are taken from utterly tighten up, mostly right adult opposite a press of a crowd, withdrawal no graphic credentials to a shot, here a performer and a patrolman mount a stretch from a camera, permitting for an unrestricted longways perspective of Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard and a military barricades that line it, delimiting a crowds. Police barricades are manifest in a array of a other photographs — and, like a frames, can be review as form, content, and even embellishment — though this apart perspective of them some-more starkly reminds us of their territorial duty and a insidious, punitive undertones. In a close-up shots, by contrast, a barricades make for a surprisingly porous range marker, as spectators customarily cranky over onto a march side of them to poise for a camera or usually to get a small closer to a action.

Of all a anomalies in a detailed series, of all a things that are outward a performative support of march conviviality, a pointed military participation is maybe a many telling. Of course, a participation of military barricades indicates that a military aren’t, in one sense, anomalies during all: for improved and for worse, they are partial of a really structure and pattern of a march and of a incomparable Harlem village (then as now). But within a manifest star of “Art Is…,” a military officers, all white, mount out for their annoy as contextual minorities and, especially, by their purpose as puritanical management total practically confining a performative merrymaking.

Lorraine O’Grady, “Art is. . . (Framing Cop)” (1983/2009), chromogenic tone print, 16 x 20 inches

Four cops seem opposite a forty images; usually one shares a spectators’ gaiety. In that sole image, “Art Is… (Framing Cop),” a framing dynamics are again formidable and evocative. On a right, a lady performer stands in profile, confronting center, with a tight-lipped and faintly mischievous smile, holding an dull support tighten to her face. On a left, a masculine patrolman stands confronting her, dual or 3 feet away, palm loose on his hip, with an tractable smile. Because a frame, too, is in profile, a dull interior is for once not manifest to us; all we can see of a support is a side. Though a performer, by holding a support adult to her possess face, is a pretended “canvas” here, with a patrolman as a viewer, her far-reaching and acid eyes suggest, as a picture’s pretension implies, that she is a one doing a looking, and it is a patrolman who is on display. Her demeanour puts a doubt to a cop, tests him: Do we really see me? Can we see that we can see you, too? It is not an easy doubt — distant easier to wince divided or omit it — though a cop’s naturalness, his apparent pleasure during her performance, suggests that he can indeed see her as a theme with her possess group and lifeblood and not usually as an art intent — or worse.

Another approach to contend it: since frames that are filled with a pattern settle a hierarchy between spectator and viewed, an dull support frames things in dual coexisting directions, creation any spectator also a viewed, potentially expelling a hierarchy. Hanging by itself, a exhibition’s fortieth and final image, “Art Is… (Girl Pointing),” puts a doubt to a museum-goer. From off-camera, a black palm binds adult an dull rectilinear support in front of a peopled Harlem sidewalk. Front and core in a frame, playfully smiling and indicating during a camera, we see a black lady of about 10 or eleven. Her gesture, acted though unforced, implicates a spectator in a teasing way, as if to say, I can see you, too, or, Im throwing it behind to we now. It is a gesticulate of mutual recognition, a gesticulate of warmth. Behind her, towards a bottom corner of a frame, are rectilinear slices of military barricades, Mondrian-esque streaks of blue. Turn adult a corners of your mouth, dear Viewer — dear Viewed — and indicate behind during a fun that refuses to be contained by a frames that connect it.

Lorraine O’ Grady: Art Is… continues during a Studio Museum in Harlem (144 West 125th Street, Harlem, Manhattan) by Oct 25.

  • Get Hyperallergic in your Inbox!

    Subscribe to the email newsletter. (Daily or Weekly)

small.wp_rp_excerpt { line-height:115%; font-style:normal; } .related_post_title { } ul.related_post { line-height:120%; } ul.related_post li { list-style-type:none; clear:both; margin:0 0 0 3px; } ul.related_post li a { font-weight: bold; display:block; margin:0 0 5px 0; } ul.related_post li a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } ul.related_post li A img { width:130px; height:auto; }

More frame ...

› tags: photo frame /