In 1970s Japan, a New Art of Experiments, Edgy Photos, and Big Ideas

September 20, 2015 - photo frame

Daidō Moriyama, “Lips” (1970), gelatin china print, 7 1/16 x 10 3/4 inches (©Daidō Moriyama, imitation pleasantness of a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston)

There are certain exhibitions in that some or many of a works on arrangement are so interesting, provocative, or well-made that they somehow conduct to overcome whatever limiting or sensational critical-theoretical accoutrements their organizers have erected around them, defying a methodical filters by that they are meant to be deliberate and understood.

For a New World to Come: Experiments in Japanese Art and Photography, 19681979, a two-venue muster with photography during a core, is one of them. To be sure, there are many intriguing, well-thought-out, well-executed works on perspective in this large presentation, a initial partial of that has non-stop during New York University’s Grey Art Gallery. Part two will open during Japan Society on Oct 9.

However, a ponderousness of some aspects of a critical-theoretical apparatus this muster puts onward as the critical/art-historical context in that a works on perspective should be appreciated appears to be a weight even a strongest artistic expressions contingency swell out of their proceed in sequence to be presented on their possess terms. It’s a challenge, nonetheless a many constrained works on perspective here overcome it. Among them: photographs by Takuma Nakahira, Daidō Moriyama and Kōji Taki, and crafty mixed-media works by Nobuo Yamanaka and Tsunehisa Kimura.

To be precise, it is a catalog concomitant this differently concrete and educational muster that is academic and disappointing, not a some-more obvious exegetic wall texts, labels and other sources of information that seem in a arrangement spaces.

Keiji Uematsu, “Horizontal Position” (1973/2003), gelatin china print, 57 1/8 x 35 7/16 inches (©Keiji Uematsu, imitation pleasantness of Yumiko Chiba Associates)

Its catalogue, though, purports to be an constituent partial of a exhibition, not merely a 256-page, three-pound souvenir, nonetheless it lands with a thud. If it were not such a poignant member of this well-researched exhibition, it would not authority many attention. However, it does and it should, if for no other reason than a fact that, prolonged after this uncover has been packaged adult and sent home, for improved or worse, a catalog and a pronouncements about a design and themes now underneath hearing will offer as a norm anxiety about them.

In essays by some-more than a dozen contributors, this volume dips deeply into a postmodernist squeeze bag of tired lingo and perceived notions to brand fanciful “sites” or “spaces” in that assorted Japanese artists of a 1970s, contracting several “strategies,” followed their “projects” (meaning their sold bodies of work or specific works or series, along with a gain of a ideas that sensitive them).

The book serves adult large ungainly neologisms and other labels, including some from Japan (“on-site-ism,” “concept photo,” “international contemporaneity,” “dark conceptualism”), whose clich� or mediocre obviousness mostly trumps their would-be taxonomic value. This salad of mind-numbing nomenclature is tossed around within a book’s sold essays, as good as volleyed between them, with irritating frequency.

That some of this book’s Japanese contributors mechanically recycle and parrot alien pomo doctrine from a West though building some-more strange points of perspective is embarrassing. Is there a order in academia and a exhibition-curating universe stipulating that catalog texts contingency be combined in a demeanour that is graceless, regular and lacking enchanting literary style?

To take this kind of proceed in 2015 is intellectually lazy, and during this point, a fun is on pomo-crit’s still-devoted practitioners, who possibly can't or do not know that their theory’s presumably rebellious opinion (or methodical proceed or inquisitive “strategy”) that once defiantly challenged a reckless of art history’s determined canon, has devolved into a cliché-ridden “project” in a possess right. Could it be that a time has come to lapse to examining artworks for what they have to contend for themselves, by themselves? There was a time when such an proceed would have been referred to as “formalist.” Nowadays, it competence be regarded as refreshing.

Kōji Enokura, “Two Stains” (1972), silkscreened detailed design on fabric, 56 5/16 x 68 1/2 inches (©Kōji Enokura, imitation pleasantness of M+, Hong Kong)

For a New World to Come: Experiments in Japanese Art and Photography, 19681979 was orderly by Yasufumi Nakamori, a associate curator of photography during a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, where a muster was initial presented progressing this year. It takes as a starting indicate a duration in a late 1960s when Japan was low in a throes of fast-paced reformation following World War II, that in time would turn famous as a postwar “economic miracle.” As severe critics and tyro protesters in a 1960s observed, however, mass production’s element rewards, an rising consumer enlightenment and what a Japanese artist Takashi Murakami decades later, in a mid-2000s, would impute to as his country’s “infantilizing” attribute with a United States, all came during a price.

Japanese society, in that long-held traditions had nurtured large generations, and people and communities had prolonged subsequent a clarity of temperament from a group-oriented structure, found itself challenged by a quick expansion of large cities in a postwar period. For many Japanese, a tie of economic, domestic and amicable army spelled rapid, unstoppable change. The late 1960s saw protests in Japan opposite a U.S.-Japan Security Treaty and a Vietnam War. Against such a backdrop, this muster points out, some Japanese artists sought new ways of communicating by art. For a New World to Come examines how such innovators joined art and photography, and by their efforts paved a proceed for a mixed-media art forms Japanese artists would emanate in after decades.

In a write interview, Nakamori observed, “In Japan and elsewhere, as distant as art story is concerned, a duration of a 1970s has been something of a lacuna. With pleasantness to Japan, people seem to consider a late 1970s, in particular, was a duration when not a lot was going on. In fact, a 1970s was a duration in which, around a world, photography became a dictionary of many contemporary-art practice.” As Nakamori observes in a show’s catalogue, in a area of photography in Japan, starting in a late 1960s, contention unfolded in partial around a impression of “modern” photography, “in that ‘expressions’ and ‘truth’ were a dual many critical values,” and around “contemporary” photography, “in that new methodologies and realities were being followed in a rising media culture, and ‘painters’ were commencement to incorporate photography into their interdisciplinary works.”

In his interview, Nakamori combined that, after a fading, or suppression, of a Japanese criticism movements of a late 1960s and early 1970s, some artists, including literary artists, were seen to have incited inward, toward a some-more personal, reduction romantic or confrontational art. As a stream muster illustrates, some Japanese artists of a 1970s questioned art’s functions and determined forms. In building new modes of art-making, they infrequently took a inlet and functions of art themselves as their subjects.

Jirō Takamatsu, “Photograph of a Photograph (No. D-2401)” (1972), gelatin china print, 21 5/8 x 26 3/16 inches (©The Estate of Jirō Takamatsu, imitation pleasantness of a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, and Yumiko Chiba Associates) (click to enlarge)

With some 350 works of opposite kinds on view, For a New World to Come examines, in part, such pivotal events as a 1968 Tokyo exhibition Photography 100 Years: A History of Photographic Expressions of a Japanese, dual of whose organizers, a photographers Takuma Nakahira (who died progressing this month) and Kōji Taki, would go on to emanate a repository Provoke. While that landmark muster looked behind during how complicated photography had grown in Japan, Provoke would shake adult modernist imitation aesthetics with radical ideas about what contemporary photography could be and that subjects it could explore. For a New World to Come also looks during a impact of a 10th Tokyo Biennale: Between Man and Matter of 1970, an muster in that artists like Hitoshi Nomura and Jirō Takamatsu used photography in ways that would now be seen as “conceptual.”

At Japan Society, large photobooks or photography magazines will be on view, despite in protecting vitrines, so that usually their covers or representation page spreads will be visible. Among these publications, viewers will find all 3 issues of Provoke (1968-1969), that featured images by such artists as Nakahira, Taki, Moriyama, Takahiko Okada and Yutaka Takanashi; Shōmei Tōmatsu’s Oh! Shinjuku (1969); Nakahira’s still rebellious-feeling For a Language to Come (1970); and Moriyama’s Farewell Photography (1972). Many of these books underline a are, bure, boke (“grainy, blurry, out of focus”) impression of image-making that became a hallmark of such photographers as Moriyama and Taki. Often dim in tinge and high in contrast, these photos of night streets, cars, fish tanks, buildings and passers-by (whose faces and bodies seemed hallucinatory and abstracted) alluded to or indeed decorated a harder, darker side of Japan’s civic jungles in a postwar period.

Photograph by Daidō Moriyama from a book “Farewell Photography” (1970), gelatin china print, 19 15/16 x 12 1/8 inches (©Daidō Moriyama, imitation pleasantness Tokyo Polytechnic University, Shadai Gallery and Taka Ishii Gallery)

The perfect edginess of such images seemed to doubt a presumably stable, democratic, moneyed Japan that was being erected on a stays of wartime drop and discredited political-economic ideas. Nakahira’s photobook, For a Language to Come, from that a stream muster derives a title, is a riveting, proto-punk, utopian-dystopian phantasmagoria of dizzy-fuzzy images in a are, bure, boke mode. At Japan Society, a whole calm of a book will be projected on a wall-mounted shade so that visitors will be means to suffer a prodigy of paging by it, widespread by spread, and savoring a creator’s dictated image-sequence stroke and impact. (If usually all of a photobooks in a uncover could be likewise projected or displayed on hold screens, nonetheless such an designation would cost a fortune.)

Untitled sketch (1968-1973, printed 2014) by Takuma Nakahira from a book “For a Language to Come” (1970), gelatin china print, 19 7/8 x 16 1/16 inches (©Takuma Nakahira, imitation pleasantness of a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston)

Japan Society’s apportionment of a muster will also underline a array of black-and-white photos documenting Hitoshi Nomura’s Tardiology (1968-1969), a high structure of built card boxes, that a artist authorised to self-destruct, theme to gravity’s lift and a weather, as good as Jirō Takamatsu’s photographs of found photographs and his Shadow (Double Shadow of a Baby) (acrylic on canvas, 1969; reproduced in 1997). That work was partial of Takamatsu’s Shadow Paintings series. As a contemporary Japanese censor Yuri Mitsuda writes in a exhibition’s catalogue, quoting this successful artist, who died in 1998, works like this one “were not paintings as such nonetheless [rather] apparatuses to emanate a ‘state of happening’ wherein ‘merely shadows exist though a participation of [the] objects that expel them.’” Thus, Mitsuda explains, “[T]he design was emphatically related to genuine space, that is, a exterior.”

Hitoshi Nomura, one of 8 photographs from a “Tardiology” array (1968-1969), any design 19 11/16 x 23 5/8 inches (©Hitoshi Nomura; pleasantness of Fergus McCaffrey)

Apparently, that kind of “emphatic” tie to a supposed genuine universe of postwar Japan was an alienating one for Kōji Enokura, whose ontological ruminations took a form of such works as a black-and-white photos P.W. No. 50 Symptom Floor, Water (1974) and P.W. No. 51 Symptom Floor, Hand (1974), and a silkscreened-on-fabric imitation image, Two Stains (1972). As catalog writer Robin Kelsey, a highbrow of photography during Harvard University, points out, in a second of these works, a tellurian palm is seen hovering over a linoleum building in a typical, complicated building of a kind that was quick replacing comparison structures in postwar Japan. For Enokura, Kelsey writes, that floor, and a building of that it was a part, “constituted a disorienting new informative form.”

At NYU’s Grey Art Gallery and during Japan Society, visitors will find works by Keiji Uematsu. In his imitation array Standing Frame (1976), this sculptor combined manifest puns by holding adult what looks like an empty, rectilinear design support and photographing several configurations of a shade that was expel on a belligerent by his body-turned-sculptural-object. In other photos, Uematsu placed his physique inside a doorway frame, effectively apropos partial of a sculptural-architectural form he was examining.

Kōji Enokura, “P.W. No. 51 Symptom — Floor, Hand” (1974), gelatin china print, 9 7/8 x 8 inches (©Michiyo Enokura, imitation by Paul Hester, Hester + Hardaway Photography, pleasantness a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston)

The uncover also calls pleasantness to Shunji Dodo’s photos of an American in a Japanese city where a U.S. troops bottom was located, and of a campus criticism in 1969; and works by a striking engineer and censor Tsunehisa Kimura, who done photo-collages that critiqued postwar Japan’s civic ethos and ambitions. His Commercialism (1970) depicts large billboards lonesome with corporate logos growing faster than houses opposite a swath of war-ravaged Tokyo. (That work is reproduced in a exhibition’s catalogue.) In Central Park 3 (photo mixture and acrylic on canvas, 1971), Kunié Sugiura, one of a few women artists represented in a exhibition, available a textured aspect of a stone in New York’s famous park.

A few years ago, Hitoshi Nomura, one of a many strange thinkers in (and now a reputable doyen of) a conceptual-art margin examined by For a New World to Come, remarkable that, in a 1970s, he sought ways in that to “represent a characteristics of time and space in equal prominence” by his art.

Hitoshi Nomura, “‘moon’ score, Dec 19, 1975” (1975), gelatin china print, printed circa 1995, 37 7/8 x 39 3/8 inches (photo pleasantness of a Museum of Fine Arts, Houston) (click to enlarge)

In a action-performance-event works he photographed, like Dryice (1969) and Iodine (1970), a decay or light disappearance of celebrated materials became metaphorical inclination for measuring flitting time. At NYU, photos of phases of a Earth’s moon in his moon score (1975) offer a identical function, one he once called “sculpting time.” A excellent preference of Nomura’s new sound and photo-based works is now on perspective during Fergus McCaffrey in Chelsea. There, final week, Nomura told me, “I’m meddlesome in a army of nature. My art gives my observations of those army manifest form. The Earth itself is a biggest timepiece; it is a possess best timekeeper.”

Japanese artist Hitoshi Nomura during Fergus McCaffrey, New York, final week with his photo-based, mixed-media work “The Sun on Latitude 35N: Toyonaka” (1968-2010), 50 1/4 x 123 3/8 x 31 1/2 inches (photo by a author for Hyperallergic)

Nobuo Yamanaka, who died young, in 1982, is another artist whose work is noted by musical subtleties. In 1971, this experimenter with pinhole photography famously projected a film of Tokyo’s issuing Tama River onto a aspect of a stream itself. In a stream exhibition, Fixed River (1972), a some-more immobile chronicle of that work, is on display. In this form, Yamanaka’s design of a stream is slide-projected by a quarrel of hanging, pure screens.

Inherent in Nomura’s and Yamanaka’s art, and in a best of a other works on view, is rewarding justification of a elegant sensibility this big, theory-laden muster regrettably mostly ignores. Nevertheless, that spirit, that desirous a common voice of a Japanese artists of a 1970s who dared to suppose a new denunciation of art-making, never mind a new, postwar, improved universe to come, is one that stays enchanting and unassailable in ways that, fortunately, no pomo theorist has nonetheless been means to capture, codify, banalize or tame.

Part one of For a New World to Come: Experiments in Japanese Art and Photography, 1968–1979 continues during New York Universitys Grey Art Gallery (100 Washington Square East) by Dec 5. Part two will be presented during Japan Society (333 East 47th Street) from Oct 9, 2015 by Jan 10, 2016.

Hitoshi Nomura continues during Fergus McCaffrey (514 West 26th Street, Chelsea, Manhattan) by Oct 24.

  • Get Hyperallergic in your Inbox!

    Subscribe to the email newsletter. (Daily or Weekly)

small.wp_rp_excerpt { line-height:115%; font-style:normal; } .related_post_title { } ul.related_post { line-height:120%; } ul.related_post li { list-style-type:none; clear:both; margin:0 0 0 3px; } ul.related_post li a { font-weight: bold; display:block; margin:0 0 5px 0; } ul.related_post li a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } ul.related_post li A img { width:130px; height:auto; } http://hyperallergic.com/237537/in-1970s-japan-a-new-art-of-experiment-edgy-photos-and-big-ideas/

More frame ...

› tags: photo frame /